Peak Gay


National LGBT lobbying groups face the horrifying prospect of seeing their profits dwindle as legal equality gains ground in the US. In response they’re seeking new ways of capitalizing on discrimination and exploiting volunteer labor.

On Thursday night Allyson Robinson gave a one-hour talk to a small audience of parishioners at St. Mark’s Cathedral, one of many events the downtown Minneapolis church has hosted in celebration of our city’s Pride Month, focusing this year on transgender issues and individuals. I attended, and found the presentation both intriguing and infuriating in what it revealed about the industry of high-level civil rights lobbying.

Robinson, former director of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the first and last director of the bankrupt Outserve-SLDN, an LGBT network of active military personnel, now runs a boutique consulting firm, Warrior Poet Strategies, “advising select clients in organizational design, diversity and inclusion, and social and civic entrepreneurship.” She will also participate tonight in a discussion among transgender panelists, Out in Gospel, and will preach the sermon at St. Mark’s special 4:00 pm Pride Service this Sunday.

After lengthy prefatory remarks recognizing leftist criticism of “Gay Inc.”* for their hefty executive salaries, coziness to power (particularly the Democratic Party), and their insular, DC Beltway focus, Robinson admitted that she rather took pride in what originated as a pejorative term. The epithet Gay Inc, she said, suggests the same sort of successful model as Apple and Amazon — small corporations that have grown within a mere couple decades into gigantic powerhouses. She neglected, of course, to mention that those businesses did so by exploiting their workers ruthlessly, conniving with politicians, and gobbling up any small competitors they didn’t simply put out of business. Some comparisons are simply too appropriate.

She also drew an analogy between “peak oil”, the point in time where the maximum rate of oil production occurs, and what she terms “peak equality”, where the maximum rate of progress toward equal rights is reached. Peak oil worldwide is expected around 2020; peak equality in the US, Robinson says, may be occurring right now. Both cases, she suggested, will require corporations involved to radically alter their strategies if they wish to survive. She predicted that within a decade, contributions to HRC would dwindle from $40 million a year to half that, and that the current 503(c) model for non-profits would be largely abandoned in favor of methods such as crowdfunding, a la Kickstarter.

Allow me to wipe away a few crocodile tears for the plight of Gay Inc. As one of the many leftists whose critiques Robinson referred to, and generally seemed to agree with, I long ago stopped looking to the national LGBT lobbies for leadership in obtaining equal rights. Politicians and capitalists like them rarely take the vanguard; instead, like Barack Obama, they “lead from behind”. The fight for marriage equality, for example, occurred primarily at the municipal and state levels due to the energy and commitment of thousands upon thousands of dedicated individual activists and a few brave local politicians. Most of us who advocated same-sex marriage were dismissed as pipe-dreamers twenty years ago, with national groups advocating separate-but-equal “civil unions” if they even cared to broach the issue. Like pride parades, however, big business has now taken to its bosom what once was the province of radical activists. Our success has been monetized.

I don’t regret that in itself. I will be glad when the LGBT pride parades of June become like the Irish pride parades on St. Patrick’s Day, simply another excuse for debauchery and wearing garish clothes that emerged from a struggle for justice. But when Gay Inc. grabs the energy (and the credit) in order to dole it back out at its own whims to local fights, it becomes a hindrance, skimming off profits as insurance companies do while providing little real benefit to anyone but the rich and famous. The larger a company, the less responsive it is to the people it serves, and the more it stifles smaller local concerns.

And fundamentally I find the fight for equality contradictory to the nature of a capitalist system. Capitalism requires a few very wealthy people sitting atop a mass of impoverished workers. Certainly it will be a great day when sexual orientation or gender identity can no longer be used to divide us from one another, but in order to maintain a hierarchy, some other distinction (such as immigration status or prison record) will necessarily come to the fore. Best to fight to change the entire system as we change our own section, rather than simply shift the burden from one group to another while keeping the fundamental injustice in place.

We can’t place a price tag on justice; why then do we think we can slap a corporate logo on it?


* “Gay Inc” — insider slang for the million-dollar nonprofits such as HRC, NGLTF (the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force) and GLAAD (the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) that dominate the Washington DC queer lobbying establishment.

Listing to Portman

rob portman picture

The Grand Bargain marches ever onward. Lindsey Boerma of CBS News reports:

Republicans would be willing to tender more revenue in a deal to replace the sequester, Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, said today on “Face the Nation,” if President Obama showed willingness to make “structural changes” to entitlement programs.

Part of Congress’s bipartisan supercommittee tasked with crafting a plan to reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion, Portman said he and his colleagues came “very close” to striking a “balanced” compromise that partnered spending cuts with revenue to replace the blind, across-the-board cuts known as sequestration before they went into effect March 1. “The problem,” he said, was that Democrats’ proposal to generate revenue fell back on tax hikes, two months after the so-called “fiscal cliff” package upped income taxes on families making more than $450,000 a year.

“We had tax reforms [in the failed plan], which helps grow the economy,” Portman said.

Portman’s statement makes the distinction between “tax reforms” — lowering corporate tax rates while removing loopholes are the reforms currently under discussion — and tax increases, and the Obama Administration has more than once signaled its desire for tax reforms as well. And “structural changes” to entitlements frequently refers to cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid effected by altering the cost-of-living formulas, another approach the Administration has said it is willing to agree to. The difficulty both parties face is getting their members and voters to embrace the betrayals of principle the eventual agreement would require.

The one obvious winner in such a deal would be large corporations, whose taxes would be cut and who could subsequently lobby to restore any loopholes temporarily suspended. Perhaps not surprisingly, Portman, a Finance Committee member and former Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under George W. Bush, takes in plenty of campaign contributions from Ohio Republican billionaire investors. Portman’s number one contributor was the Cincinnati insurance and investment company American Financial Group (AFG). Until his death in 2011, Carl Lindner, Jr. owned and ran AFG; he was one of the richest people in the world and a prominent Republican donor, with AFG giving Portman alone over a quarter million dollars. (Lindner’s ice cream company United Dairy Farmers also gave $55,000, ranking 17th.) AFG’s legal representatives, Cincinnati firm Keating Muething & Kleklamp (KMK) ranked 12th. (One of its founding partners, Charles Keating, Jr., later served several years in jail as part of the Keating Five savings and loan scandal.) “Vulture fund” Elliott Management, an investment bank dealing with “distressed debt”, ranked third on Portman’s list, giving $115,000; its founder and CEO Paul Singer is another major Republican contributor. Likewise Mercer Reynolds of investment firm Reynolds, DeWitt & Co. (18th with $54,000) was George W. Bush’s campaign finance chair.

Investment and professional service corporations outside Ohio also look kindly on Portman. These include mutual fund mammoth FMR Corp. (Fidelity) (sixth), “Big Four” banking giants Citigroup (ninth) and JPMorgan Chase (11th), insurance multinational MetLife (tenth), and Edward Jones Investments (15th). Accounting firm Ernst & Young (seventh) and the world’s largest advertising company WPP Group (14th) also made large donations.

Many of his donors come from in-state, however. Cincinnati-based purveyors of pet food and personal care products Procter & Gamble (second) plunked down $179,000 for Portman, while Cincinnati laundry company and KMK client Cintas Corp. (eighth) may well clean up the sheets, towels and uniforms manufactured and distributed by Standard Textile (16th). Cleveland-based legal practice Squire Sanders (fourth), for whom Portman worked after resigning as George W. Bush’s OMB director, gave him over $100,000. Ohio’s main corporate law firm Thomspon Hine (13th), and Ohio-based BakerHostetler (20th).

Other contributors to Portman include the third-largest company in the world, General Electric (fifth) and real estate developers North American Properties (19th).

The quality of Merkley

jeff merkley picture

Same shit, different flies. That Democrats welcome from Obama what they recoiled from under Bush has become so commonplace that it’s now a cliche. In the latest example, only two Democratic Senators (Jeff Merkley and Pat Leahy) as well as Independent Bernie Sanders declined to support the appointment to head the CIA of a man who oversaw the application of torture during the Bush Administration and was assassination czar during Obama’s tenure. In a statement following his vote against Brennan’s confirmation, Merkley wrote:

“I have deep concerns with the Obama Administration’s continuation of Bush-era policies related to warrantless wiretapping and the collection of electronic records pertaining to the activities of ordinary citizens.

“I have concerns about policies that allow the administration to strip due process rights from Americans it chooses to deem enemy combatants. Those lost rights constitute core constitutional values, including the requirement to show cause for detaining a citizen, the right to a public trial, and the right to confront those who bear evidence against you.

“I am also deeply concerned about the implications of the administration’s policy on drone strikes. And I am troubled that so much of the legal justification for these policies remains secret, preventing Congress, let alone the American people, from weighing the trade-offs.”

Previously I’ve written about Rand Paul, who led a filibuster against Brennan with the aid of Mike Lee, as well as summarizing the donors to Merkley’s fellow Oregon Senator Ron Wyden, who joined in Paul’s filibuster but voted to confirm Brennan anyway. Today I’ll look at Merkley himself.

Merkley’s largest donor, giving him over $78,000 since 2008, is JStreetPAC, a political action committee favoring a peaceful resolution to the Palestine-Israel conflict. His second largest is the arms control non-profit the Council for a Livable World, which gave him $56,000. In addition, he has attracted significant contributions from several other left-leaning issue-based organizations, including (sixth), the League of Conservation Voters (eighth). Democratic politico Steve Westly‘s clean-tech venture capital firm the Westly Group (13th) also invested in Merkley, who is chair of the Subcommittee on Green Jobs and the New Economy.

The Oregon Senator receives a great deal of money from in-state sources, including workers from the State of Oregon (third) and Portland/Hillsboro’s Oregon Health & Science University (fourth), the state’s largest private employer, Intel (fifth) in Hillsboro, and Portland-area footwear giant Nike (17th). Lawyers and law firms also gave heavily to Merkley; he received lots of attention from the largest law firm in Oregon, Portland’s Stoel Rives (seventh), trial lawyers Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman (11th), and Portland litigation and securities firm Stoll Berne (16th).

Unions move big bucks into Merkley’s corner. Among his major supporters are the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (ninth); the country’s largest federation of unions, the AFL-CIO (tenth); the American Nurses Association (12th); the Teamsters Union (18th); and tying for 20th with $15,000 apiece: the Communications Workers of America, the Ironworkers Union, the Operating Engineers Union, and the Painters and Allied Trades Union.

Merkley also received donations from real estate services firm Newmark Knight Frank (14th), hedge fund investors D. E. Shaw & Co. (15th), and gigantoid media conglomerate Time Warner (19th).

A Mike Lee story

predator drone picture

Kiss goodbye to another bit of the Bill of Rights. After thirteen hours of delay, the shredding of the US Constitution resumed today, with only a few Senators — mainly Tea Party Republicans — having briefly stood in its way. Torture and assassination supporter John Brennan was just confirmed 63-34 with only three members of the Democratic caucus (Merkley, Leahy and Sanders) opposing him. The delay occurred because, as Kevin Gosztola of FireDogLake wrote yesterday:

The nomination of John Brennan to the position of CIA director is currently being held up by a filibuster being led by Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. He has been joined by Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah and even Democratic Senator Ron Wyden to ask “questions” of him as he filibusters.

Much of the motivation for standing on the Senate floor for the past hours has to do with the fact that Attorney General Eric Holder has declined to say outright that targeting and killing a US citizen suspected of plotting a terrorist attack on US soil, who did not pose an imminent threat, would be illegal. Paul submitted three letters and finally on March 5 Holder gave him an answer. However, it did not rule out the use of drone strikes and say this would be unconstitutional.

I’ve previously given an overview of the major contributors to Paul and Wyden. Today I’ll look at who has given money to Lee, who joined the Senate in 2010.

Several major donors to the Utah Senator have ties to Mitt Romney, 2012 Republican presidential candidate and a former Utah resident. Lee’s top donor by far, giving nearly $75,000, was APX Alarm (now Vivint), a Provo-based home security firm; its president is Alex Dunn, Mitt Romney’s former chief of staff. Murray Energy (third), an Ohio coal mining corporation run by prominent Romney supporter Robert E. Murray, fueled Lee’s campaign with $24,000, as did Provo dietary supplement sellers Nu Skin Enterprises (fourth).

Law firms edged out business services as Lee’s biggest industry. Huge corporate law firm Sidley Austin (second) contributed $28,000; mergers and acquisitions specialists Sullivan & Cromwell ranked sixth and bankruptcy law firm Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones 11th.

Many of Lee’s big donors came from his home state of Utah. Payday loan company Tosh Inc. (Check City) (fifth), has its headquarters in Provo. Herbal supplement manufacturers Basic Research (seventh) work out of Salt Lake City, as does billboard company Reagan Outdoor Advertising (eighth). Online marketing business Omniture (tenth), acquired by software multinational Adobe, was moved from Orem to Lehi. Draper professional services firm NPEC (12th-19th) gave $10,000, while Saint George energy company Paydirt Capital, Salt Lake City’s Perry Homes, and Centerville investment advisors Wealth Navigation (20th-23rd) all donated $9,600.

Other significant contributors to Lee include the world’s largest software company, Microsoft (ninth). $10,000 donations came in from lobbying groups the American Bankers Association, the Credit Union National Association, and the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors; and political action committees OrrinPAC, representing Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, former Senator Jim DeMint’s Tea Party Senate Conservatives Fund, and the pro-Israel Citizens Organized. Pharmacy services company Medco Health Solutions gave $10,000 too, while venture capital firm Northgate Capital (20th-23rd) gave $9,600.

Calling Collins

susan collins picture

Start shopping for cat food — the austerity crowd in Washington DC is gathering to cut the benefits you’ve already paid for. As Richard Cowan and Steve Holland of Reuters reported yesterday:

Gene Sperling, the White House senior economic official, said on the CNN program “State of the Union” on Sunday that Obama was contacting to lawmakers to talk about compromises that could include reforms to both the tax code and entitlement programs, which include Social Security retirement benefits and Medicare health care for the elderly and disabled.


An aide to Collins, a moderate, told Reuters that she spoke to Obama on Monday afternoon and they talked about “the need for a bipartisan agreement on several critical issues,” such as how to rein in the $16.7 trillion U.S. debt and the sequestration cuts.

Since Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) is being wooed by the White House in an effort to punish the poor even further, it seems like a good time to examine who her major donors have been. It’s perhaps not surprising that many of them are wealthy investors and corporations.

Collins’s top donor was credit card colossus MBNA, which was acquired by Bank of America in 2006. Other investment banks/financial services firms contributing to the Maine Republican include “vulture fund” Elliott Management (eighth) and Goldman Sachs (11th), as well as accounting mainstay Ernst & Young (20th).

Military aerospace contractors drop plenty of money into the campaigns of the Northeastern Republican, who sits on the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. She’s received money from General Dynamics (second), Raytheon (ninth), and the Hartford, CT, based United Technologies Corporation (14th).

Collins, who was lobbied heavily from all sides on Obamacare, also received lots of attention from medical industry donors. These included health insurance behemoth Blue Cross Blue Shield (fourth); physicians’ group the American Medical Association (15th); Groton, CT, pharmaceutical megabusiness Pfizer (16th); health care trade group the American Hospital Association (17th); and Hartford, CT, managed health care corporation Aetna (19th).

Other major donors to Collins include The Wish List (third), a political action committee devoted to electing pro-choice Republican women in the Senate and House; worldwide hoteliers Marriott (sixth); telecom player Verizon (seventh); international law firm Blank Rome (seventh); massive media conglomerate Time Warner (tenth); the largest pulp and paper company in the world, International Paper (12th); package delivery corporation the United Parcel Service (UPS) (13th); and mailing and shipping company Pitney Bowes (18th).


Side note: There is no family relation (that I know of) between me and former Maine Representative Tom Allen, Collins’s Democratic opponent for the Senate in 2008.

What about Bob Menendez?

bob menendez picture

If Israel pulls the trigger, will the US supply the bullets? As bipartisan support in Washington ramps up for war with Iran, Bob Menendez, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, is leading the charge. Jamal Abdi of the National Iranian American Council reports:

New legislation introduced by Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ) calls for the U.S. to provide military, economic, and diplomatic support for Israel should its government decide to launch military strikes on Iran. The measure would effectively signal that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can decide not just whether to enter Israel into war with Iran, but whether the United States enters such a war. It comes as tentative diplomatic progress was reported from negotiations involving the U.S. and Iran.

The unprecedented measure is being unveiled as part of the annual American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference this weekend in Washington, DC, that will bring thousands of the group’s supporters to push the measure on Capitol Hill. The group will also support a new sanctions bill in the House that could authorize the U.S. to sanction companies, including in Europe and Asia, for any commercial dealings with Iran. That measure has raised concerns about further exacerbating medicine shortages impacting the people of Iran.

The Graham resolution is framed as a non-binding measure aimed at encouraging the President to implement and escalate sanctions on Iran. But the final clause “urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.”

The bill will likely please one of Menendez’s largest donors, NORPAC (ninth), which advocates for foreign aid to Israel and sanctions on Iran, Palestine, and Saudi Arabia. NORPAC — the North Jersey Political Action Committee — acts as the campaign arm of AIPAC, which lobbies for and against legislation. Marsha Cohen of Lobe Log describes them this way:

Although the two organizations have remained separate and distinct, there’s been an overlap of talking points, priorities and modus operandi. NORPAC’s leaders describe it as a “single issue” organization, dedicated exclusively to promulgating the passage of Israel-related legislation, of which anti-Iran sanctions have become an integral part.

So who else gives money to Menendez? According to, the two top industries donating to Menendez are law and real estate, with many of the individual contributors coming from in-state. The New Jersey Senator’s top donor, contributing nearly $300,000 to his campaigns since 1992, is corporate law firm Lowenstein Sandler, which originated in Newark and now has its headquarters in Roseland. Teaneck’s general service firm DeCotiis, FitzPatrick & Cole ranked second with $172,000. International partnership Greenberg Traurig (fifth) gave $141,000, while Secaucus real estate law and litigation experts Waters McPherson McNeill (17th) put in $83,500. Hackensack contractors J. Fletcher Creamer & Son (seventh) added $120,000.

Financial companies deposit plenty of funds into Menedez’s accounts. These include multinational investment bank Goldman Sachs (third), insurance giant Prudential Financial (fourth), and Swiss banking titan UBS (12th). In addition, the Senator receives backing from some of the country’s largest unions: the AFL-CIO-affiliated Laborers International Union (14th), the Teamsters (15th), and government workers’ union AFSCME (20th).

Quite a few of his major contributors, aside from the law firms mentioned above, originate in or are New Jersey-based. These include Newark gas and electric utility Public Service Enterprise Group (eighth) and Hackensack’s United Water (18th); the Spanish Broadcasting System (tenth), founded in Newark; Maher Terminals (11th), which ships from the Port of New York and New Jersey; and pharmaceutical corporation Schering-Plough (19th), based in Kenilworth.

Other big Menendez donors are telecom players Verizon (sixth) and AT&T (16th) and military suppliers Applied Companies (13th).

Jim Inhofe

jim inhofe picture

The axe is about to fall in Washington DC, and as tomorrow’s budget sequester rapidly approaches, many Senators are looking for agreement on a way to soften its impact. Laura Litvan and Brian Faler of Bloomberg report:

Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma will introduce this week a measure that would let military service chiefs move around funds within the Pentagon’s budget this fiscal year, according to his spokeswoman, Donelle Harder.

Beginning March 1, the government faces $85 billion in across-the-board cuts over seven months — half of it from defense — unless President Barack Obama and Congress agree on an alternative.

“It buys time for a better fix” for the cuts, Harder said of Inhofe’s proposal. Lawmakers in his party are seeking an elusive consensus on how to deal with the reductions, known as sequestration.

Inhofe’s measure, to be co-sponsored by Senator Pat Toomey, a Pennsylvania Republican, also would provide flexibility this fiscal year to domestic agencies facing cuts.
Inhofe’s proposal faces opposition from Republicans on the defense panel, including Senator John McCain of Arizona and Senator Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire. They back an alternative introduced by Ayotte that would delay sequestration for one year by requiring a 10 percent reduction in federal personnel through attrition and a pay freeze for lawmakers.

With Inhofe in the news this week, I decided to look at some of his major campaign contributors using

Inhofe’s top donor was Koch Industries, the Kansas multinational with interests in petroleum, chemical, fiber, finance and many other areas. Run by the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, the corporation has poured billions into fighting the regulation of energy and financial derivatives; they’ve contributed nearly $100,000 to Inhofe. Likewise Murray Energy (second), a coal mining corporation run by Robert E. Murray, lobbies frequently against mining regulations; it has contributed $66,000 to global warming denier Inhofe. Inhofe has also received numerous donations from oil and gas companies such as ConocoPhillips (11th), Oklahoma City’s Devon Energy (16th), and Chevron (19th); as well as fossil fuel users like the United Parcel Service (fifth), the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (15th), the National Automobile Dealers Association (17th), and railroaders Union Pacific (20th).

Inhofe, a licensed commercial pilot who’s had run-ins with the Federal Aviation Administration, had funds dropped into his campaign from the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (third) and Fort Worth, Texas, based American Airlines (fourth).

The Senator gets funds from several professional trade associations: the National Association of Realtors (sixth); the American Medical Association (eighth); the Associated General Contractors of America (12th); the National Beer Wholesalers Association (13th); and the American Bankers Association (18th).

Rounding out his top-twenty list are the National Rifle Association (seventh); telecom multinational AT&T (ninth); a business called Golden Rule Financial (tenth); and military and aerospace contractor Lockheed Martin (14th).

It’s news: Toomey

pat toomey tea party

Can you whittle with a hatchet? Billions of dollars of indiscriminate federal budget cuts are scheduled to take effect Friday, but Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey and Oklahoma Senator Jim Inhofe will offer a Republican alternative bill to modify the March 1 sequester. According to Robert J. Vickers of the Patriot-News:

U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey will introduce legislation as soon as Wednesday to soften the harsh, congressionally mandated spending cuts slated to be applied at the end of the week.

The bill would give President Barack Obama the authority to determine how the cuts will be applied in each department, rather than the mandated across-the-board approach dictated in the so-called “sequester,” Toomey told a handful of Pennsylvania reporters in a conference call late Tuesday afternoon.

“We need to preserve the magnitude of the cuts, but almost everybody agrees we’d be better off if they were done differently,” he said. “The problem with [across-the-board cuts] is it gives no discretion to the managers or the administration to determine which of the programs has greater urgency than another.”

The proposal would also retain Congress’s ability to reject the president’s prioritization of the cuts, he added.

Since Toomey’s in the news, I decided to look at his list of top donors on His biggest donor by far was the conservative anti-tax 501(c)4 organization the Club for Growth, which has given its former president $860,000 since 1998, almost as much as the other nineteen of his top twenty donors combined. Toomey accepted leadership of the group following his narrow 2004 Republican primary loss to former Senator Alan Specter, which the club had backed financially. Other conservative issue groups backing him included Senator Jim DeMint’s political action committee theSenate Conservatives Fund (fifth), giving $61,500, and the billionaires at Crow Holdings (16th) and Koch Industries (20th), each giving over $30,000.

“Too big to fail” banks and hedge funds invest heavily in Toomey. Elliott Management, a “vulture fund” firm that works primarily with distressed debt investments, ranked second on the Senator’s list with $115,000, while hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors (sixth) gave $46,000. Two of the Big Four banksJPMorgan Chase (seventh) Bank of America (eighth) — deposited over $40,000 in his accounts, as did professional trade group the American Bankers Association (ninth). Pittsburgh-based hedge fund Federated Investors (15th) and financial services corporation Morgan Stanley (19th) each pitched in over $30,000.

Professional trade associations look favorably on Toomey as well. He’s received significant donations from anti-union construction group the Associated Builders and Contractors (tenth), the National Restaurant Association (12th), the National Federation of Independent Business (17th), and accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers (18th).

Other big contributors to the Pennsylvania Senator are Allentown businesses Air Products & Chemicals (third) and electric utility PPL (fourth); Mechanicsburg health care company Select Medical (11th); Philadelphia ammunition manufacturers Day & Zimmermann (13th); and Exelon (14th), an energy company with several nuclear and fossil fuel plants in Pennsylvania and other states.

Boxer briefing

barbara boxer picture

Will Mother Earth become Martyr Earth? On Valentine’s Day, to avert that prospect, Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) introduced legislation to combat global climate change through the tax code. As Raju Chebium of USA Today reported:

Under the proposal, companies would pay $20 per ton of carbon or methane they emit. The tax would increase by 5.6% for each of the next 10 years. Burning coal, oil and gasoline releases carbon. Methane is the byproduct of natural gas, which is cleaner than the other fossil fuels and is coming in wide use across the USA.

Sixty percent of the revenue would go to pay monthly rebates for citizens and legal U.S. residents who are bound to face higher electric bills as utilities pass on the tax to consumers.

The rest would go toward “weatherizing” 1 million homes each year to make them more energy-efficient, increasing renewable-energy supply by setting up new wind- and solar-power projects, and creating a fund to attract private investment for clean-energy development.

Coal, oil, and natural gas producers as well as electrical utilities predictably oppose the measure. And despite his speeches about the dangers of global warming, President Obama looks unlikely to support Boxer’s proposal either. Ben Geman of The Hill reported yesterday:

Jack Lew, the White House nominee for Treasury secretary, says President Obama’s second-term vow to confront climate change will not lead to proposals to tax carbon dioxide emissions.

“The administration has not proposed a carbon tax, nor is it planning to do so,” Lew said in written responses to Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, which will vote on Lew’s nomination Tuesday.

Carbon taxes or fees are generating new interest among climate advocates and some liberal lawmakers, especially amid debates about how to curb the deficit and overhaul the tax code.

Lew’s answer is the latest of several Obama administration pledges not to propose a carbon tax.

“We would never propose a carbon tax, and have no intention of proposing one,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said in mid-November.

Given industry opposition, it’s hardly surprising that energy corporations aren’t at the head of the line to donate to Boxer’s campaigns. Instead, as shows, she receives significant donations from liberal issue donors, tech and media corporations, and lawyers and lobbyists.

Boxer’s top donor, giving over a million dollars since 1989, was EMILY’s List, the political action committee for pro-choice Democratic women. Other prominent, issue-oriented contributors are pro-environmental group the League of Conservation Voters (fourth) and arms control advocates the Council for a Livable World (tenth). The University of California (second) has bestowed over a quarter million on the California Senator; the State of California (seventh) and Stanford University (16th) also made generous donations.

The world’s four largest media corporations appear on Boxer’s list: Time Warner (third) gave over $200,000; Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. (sixth) pitched in $122,000; Walt Disney Co. (eighth) gave $95,000; and Viacom (14th) gave $74,000.

Boxer receives more money from lawyers and law firms than any other industry, and several individual firms appear on her top twenty list, most based in her home state. These include class action kings Girardi & Keese (fifth), Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy (ninth), and Milberg LLP (11th); corporate lawyers Latham & Watkins (13th); personal injury lawyers Greene Broillet & Wheeler (15th); and general practice firm O’Melveny & Myers (18th).

Other significant donors to the California Senator are high tech businesses such as San Jose network equipment manufacturers Cisco Systems (12th), San Diego semiconductor makers Qualcomm (17th), and Japanese electronics megafirm Sony (19th). Oakland health care consortium Kaiser Permanente (20th) also made her list.

Money to Coburn

tom coburn picture

The budgetary axe falls on the first of March, and the headsmen sound regretful. Writes David Kerley of ABC News’s “The Note”:

Believe it or not, there is some bipartisan agreement in Washington, D.C. The problem is Republicans and Democrats agree those automatic spending cuts known as the “sequester” will probably start on Friday, the deadline for a budget agreement.


The cuts set to be triggered on Friday will range from 5 percent to 7 percent for most government departments. They will be phased in over the next six months. Workers, who may be furloughed for up to three weeks, will get 30 days warning before they must stay home.

The battle now isn’t how to avoid the sequester, once considered so drastic that lawmakers would be forced to negotiate an alternative; it’s how and where to apportion the blame. Some Senators, such as Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma) have already hit the talk shows to begin the spin. Lindsey Boerma of CBS News reported Sunday:

“The crisis is made up – it’s been created,” Coburn continued. “We see all these claims about what a tragedy it’s going to be. The great example is, is if the secretary of transportation can assure us all the planes are going to be safe, then the Department of Homeland Security can assure us that we can get through the airports on time. They have plenty of flexibility in terms of discretion on how they spend money.”

Though he said he didn’t support the cuts, scheduled during the debt ceiling debate in 2011, because “that’s a stupid way to cut spending,” Coburn said sequestration may be “the only way Washington, Republicans and Democrats are ever going to get out of both parties some spending cuts.” The president’s idea to replace the sequester with a package that balances spending cuts and revenue through tax hikes, he said, is a “straw man” setup.

Coburn, the ranking minority member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, oversees the budgets of the DHS and the federal civil service as a whole. As he’s likely to be in the news more in the coming weeks, I thought it time to look at who he receives his campaign funds from.

Coburn’s top donor is conservative anti-tax 501(c) group the Club for Growth, which has given him over $65,000 since 1994. He’s also received significant funds from other conservative issue donors such as energy billionaires Koch Industries (sixth) and Senator Saxby Chambliss’s political action committee the Republican Majority Fund (ninth).

An obstetrician who once worked for his father, a prominent optician, Senator Coburn has accepted numerous donations from medical practitioners. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (fourth) and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (fifth) each gave him nearly $40,000. The American Academy of Ophthalmology (seventh), the American Medical Association (eighth), Oklahoma City’s Neuroscience Specialists (11th), and the American Dental Association (15th) all injected funds into the Senator’s campaigns.

Various trade associations figure prominently on Coburn’s list. The National Auto Dealers Association (tenth), the anti-union Associated Builders and Contractors (12th), the National Beer Wholesalers Association (13th), the National Federation of Independent Business (16th), the largest trade group of them all, the National Association of Realtors (18th), and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (20th) have backed the highly conservative Oklahoman.

Other prominent contributors to Coburn include Cummins-American Corp. (third), an Illinois firm specializing in money-sorting equipment for banks, automatic vendors and the like; humungous telecom multinational AT&T (second); Swiss investment bank UBS (14th); and Texas-based oil and gas companies ConocoPhilips (17th) and Andarko Petroleum (19th).